As per the rules of the Interview Meme, after answering the interview questions
posed to me by Gay Banker
, I made myself available as an interviewer to anyone who chose to be interviewed.Xmichra
was the first person to subject herself to an interrogation and did a great job of it
. Since then, Caroline
have also chosen to be interrogated, I mean interviewed. As interviewees, the three of them make a pleasantly diverse threesome with personal circumstances and blogs that are quite different from each other and coming, as they do, from Canada, England and South Africa.
The next one to sit under the spotlight is Caroline.
Caroline is my age (not to be divulged purely out of good manners, of course, but it’s easily found should you want to know) and lives in Bristol with her husband, Jim. She’s only been blogging for 6 months but has two blogs (Caro's words
and 100 Things About Me
, a collaborative blog) in addition to Caro's lines
, her art blog where I discovered her. So there’s enough interview fodder for me to find it difficult to decide on five pertinent questions.
I think I came across Caroline via Andrea’s blog
but, blog-readers being rather incestuous creatures, there are a number of other blogs that may have led me to her. Some of those are South African but most aren’t. However, one of my first comments on her blog, in reference to her father who spent many years in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) before Caroline’s birth, was to ask if she knew of the term ‘when we’, a term that South Africans often call whites who left Zimbabwe. She did, of course, and pointed me to an entry of hers from a few months ago where she wrote about her father and mentioned how often he’d say, ‘When I was in Rhodesia…’ There's nothing extraordinary about me asking that question but I suspect that it may gel with her ideas on synchronicity, something she’s a strong believer in.
Her academic background and part of her career were mathematical/scientific but her belief systems and interests seem quite removed from such logical pursuits in that she’s very artistic (something she gets from her mother) and spiritual. Her artistic pursuits are very evident by regular postings of her artistic creations. These often reflect her spiritual interests (eg various personal interpretations of a mandala
) but you need to delve into her words to find out more about those. She’s had two bad bouts of M.E. and, since then, has been advised not to return to work.
And now for the questions.
As with Xmichra, they’re quite probing and could take forever to answer if you think too hard so either take your time or just note down the first thoughts that cross your mind on reading them. And, because I found it difficult to restrict my questions to five, there’s an extra one for good luck. It would be great if you answered all six but feel free to restrict your answers to the five you feel most comfortable with.Question 1:
You love seeing faces in things. And you have always been very sensitive about texture and how things feel. You also love colour and, at times, you’ve arranged your books according to the colour of their spines. If someone were to ask you for a preference, would you pick shape, texture, colour?Question 2:
You are a trained practitioner in flower essences
and you talk of morning glory being a power plant that claimed you with great strength. Besides being a very beautiful plant, the morning glory is a powerful psychotropic
. Many artists are very open to experiencing as much of the world as possible. Have you ever taken mind-altering substances? If not, why not? If you have, do you still take them?Question 3:
You met Jim, your husband, between your two bouts of M.E. the second of which first affected you in 1996. So you will have known him from your mid-thirties, if not before, years in which many women choose to have children. You make no mention of children yet you strike me as a person who would make a very good mother and, in fact, would like to have had children. Am I right in thinking this of you? If so, why have you not had any?Question 4:
You read various ‘fortune-telling cards’, to use a rather inexact term and you have read books on dream interpretation. Many of these have different ways of interepreting signs and information based on keys, principles, and methods laid down over time. But, as I understand it, to be a good reader, much of your power is reliant on your intuition and an ability to open yourself to external influences. Do you think that if you were able to simultaneously read various types of cards (eg Tarot, Dream cards) or simultaneously apply different dream interpetation techniques to a dream you’d had, you’d land up wth conflicting interpretations? How would you interpret/handle that? Alternatively, if you believe they would not conflict with each other, how would you explain that?Question 5:
Many people, especially artists, are very receptive to music and, given a bit of encouragement, will be very passionate about their likes in music. Yet, in your blog, you make no mention of music even though Jim is the base player of the Macaroni Penguins
, your favourite band, and you talk of your much greater than average ability to hear high pitched sounds. Why?Question 6:
Unless my research is flawed, it would appear that Jim is a very keen climber and cyclist, activities that your ME would preclude you from. Is this difficult or are they activities that don’t interest you?For those of you who may want to be interviewed in this fashion, here are the Official Interview Games Rules:
- If you want to participate, leave a comment below saying, "interview me".
- I will respond by asking you five questions - each persons will be different.
- You will update your journal/blog with the answers to the questions.
- You will include this explanation and an offer to interview others in the same post.
- When others comment asking to be interviewed, you will ask them five questions.
Update: Caroline has produced a a great set of answers to my rather probing questions. I was impressed to wake up this morning and find that she'd managed to answer them so thoroughly in such a short space of time.